The Global Leader in
Legal Finance and Risk Management

Omni Bridgeway provides dispute and litigation finance
from case inception to post-judgment enforcement and recovery
across markets.

Benefiting from Experience

Track Record

35+ years’ record of success

Learn more

Expertise

Cross-practice, cross-border know-how

Learn more

Case Studies

Solutions tailored to meet nuanced needs

Learn more

Global Reach

Legal Financing and support where you need it

Learn more

Powering Your Potential Recoveries

Optimal outcomes in disputes, enforcement and recovery activities are achieved with specialty knowledge, commitment and street smarts. Our team is built to offer exactly that—serving as a formidable ally and an innovative and reliable partner for individuals, companies and professional advisers seeking strategic funding solutions for litigation costs and legal financing.

Get in touch

Understanding Litigation Finance

Stay abreast of the latest developments in dispute resolution finance, legal claims, law firm funding, and third party funding.

The Rising Tide of Legal Disputes on Data Centre Projects: How Legal Finance Can Help

Modern data centres cover millions of square metres, house expensive computing equipment, and consume as much power as small cities. They are complex undertakings involving intricate contractual obligations and supply chain interdependencies spanning all industries and economic sectors. With significant financial stakes tied to construction delays, regulatory compliance, service level agreements, intellectual property rights and energy supply, disputes are becoming more frequent and costly. Litigation funding is the perfect tool to alleviate the financial pressures created by data centre disputes and improve the investment returns on these assets.

Corporate Litigation Finance: Answers To Some of Your Company’s Questions (Part 1)

Readers of our previous issues understand that litigation finance is a tool for the legal department to control spending and help contribute to the company’s bottom line. Indeed, companies with litigation portfolios are more frequently using litigation funding to manage budgetary pressures and mitigate litigation risk. Notwithstanding the growth in this market, the companies still exploring litigation finance have questions about how it works and whether it can advance their strategic interests. This two-part series will answer some of the most prevalent questions from corporate legal departments that are considering litigation funding for their affirmative claims.

If Webuild It, Will Award Creditors Still Come? Recent Delaware Decision Complicates Efforts to Enforce Arbitral Awards in the U.S. Against Creative Debtors

The United States has long purported to be a champion of arbitration. This stance is embodied both in the “pro-arbitration” Federal Arbitration Act enacted by Congress nearly a century ago and in U.S. treaties providing for the recognition of international arbitration awards. The U.S. likewise boasts rich jurisprudence regarding personal jurisdiction, defining when parties can be hauled into court in this country. But what happens when these two principles collide, for example, when a foreign losing party to an international arbitration merges into another entity that has property in the U.S. that can be used to satisfy an adverse award?